Archive for March, 2007

Mar 15 2007

Microwave Mentality

In a recent podcast Jim Stroud did with the Recruiting Animal, Jim mentioned that the reason why there still aren’t a whole lot of recruiting blogs with worthwhile content on them is because a lot of recruiters try out blogging and when they do not see results quickly, the give it up.

I just wanted to share a few thoughts about this as a reflection of today’s society.

On January 1, fitness clubs across the country are flooded with those who made a New Year’s resolution to ‘get in shape’. For the first month, regular gym rats have to share their machines with the newbies who have promised themselves a better looking body by spring. By the end of January, the crowd has thinned out and the regulars can have their machines back. This is because the Resolutioners, not seeing the pounds melting away in the first two weeks of their new routine, have thrown in the towel and are waiting in line at McDonald’s to order a double quarter pounder and a side of fries (and a Diet Coke, because they’re trying to cut calories).

In July, a man has just purchased his first home – a fixer-upper. He purchased this home because it was cheap and because he envisioned all kinds of projects he could work on to make this house his own. By September, football season has started and because the projects were a bit more challenging than expected, they have been put to the side “temporarily” while the Bengals make their run for the playoffs – after all, this is their year! (it’s been their year for the past how many years now, Cincinnati??)

Some of you may remember the children’s book series “Frog and Toad”. In “The Garden”, Toad admires Frog’s garden and sets about to grow his own:

“What a fine garden you have, Frog,” he said.
“Yes,” said Frog. “It is very nice, but it was hard work.”

Toad ran home. He planted the flower seeds. “Now seeds,” said Toad, “start growing.” Toad walked up and down a few times. The seeds did not start to grow.
Toad put his head close to the ground and said loudly, “Now seeds, start growing!” Toad looked at the ground again. The seeds did not start to grow.
Toad put is head very close to the ground and shouted, “NOW SEEDS, START GROWING!”
Frog came running up the path. “What is all this noise?” he asked.
“My seeds will not grow,” said Toad.

Eventually, Toad’s garden began to grow, but not until he realized that it would take some hard work, just like Frog said.

Even though we have online banking, drive-thru windows, and instant messaging now, there are still some things in life that require hard work – and TIME – in order to see results. Growing a garden, getting in shape and losing weight, and developing meaningful relationships (both personal and professional), all take time and work.

And if you mean to make an impact on anyone through blogging, you’d best be patient because it may take awhile for your efforts to be fruitful. But don’t be discouraged; as the saying goes, “Everything comes gradually and at its appointed hour.” Success is when preparedness meets opportunity, and if you’re in the right place in the right time doing the right thing, you’ll find your own personal success.


Checkout Las Vegas jobs at NVJobSearch.

View Comments

Mar 13 2007

Gary Stauble Gains a Classmate in Research Kindergarten….

How long is this madness going to continue?? Recruiters who do not grasp the concept of research and therefore think that we are nothing more than glorified admin assistants who should feel fortunate to bask in their glory. For those of you who are registered on Recruiter Life Magazine, you can read this whole article here. For those of you who are not, let me give you some of my favorite lines from this article titled “Implementing Researchers In Corporate or Third Party Practices” by Doug Beabout, who is giving Gary Stauble a run for his money on my list of those who still have a lot to learn about research:

“Many of our hiring companies utilize technology inefficiently without truly realizing the negative impact of the time they’re wasting. Recent credible surveys have indicated that the average amount of time spent in Internet browsing by Corporate Americans is in excess of three hours per workday.”

I couldn’t agree more…while the Internet brings a world of information to our fingertips, recruiters can be tempted to spend more time surfing than smiling and dialing. Up to this point, I am on board with Doug in his evaluation on the benefits of research. Read on….

“If you divide the desk you must answer the question of “Who should do what?” The researchers role involves process oriented tasks can manage those details critical in the placement process, ongoing office support tasks and maintaining currency of records and contacts.

Some of the specific technology and process-based tasks they should perform are:

  • Marketing lead generations
  • Name gathering for search activity
  • Initial candidate contact and qualification
  • Secondary reference checks
  • Interview travel arrangements and confirmations
  • Gathering and distributing closing information
  • Spousal and other interface to determine key decision points and obstacles
  • Placement invoicing and follow-up
  • Quality Assurance input gathering
  • Candidate and referral follow-up
  • Managing quality assurance actions and programs*
  • Building specialization files and libraries
  • Creating in[sic] maintaining hiring managers company information files
  • Conducting scheduled candidate e-mail distribution*
  • Classified advertisements intelligence gathering (of printed media and the “Net”)*
  • Managing office interruptions and distractions*
  • Administrative correspondence and marketing campaigns*
  • Sweep and document additional and alternative markets niches*
  • Idle hiring managers tracking and maintenance efforts*
  • Web site maintenance and upgrading administration*
  • Internet and Web surfing information source manager*
  • Gatekeeper of all databases*
  • Idle candidate maintenance*”

HOLD IT right there!!! This is where I sat up straight and said aloud, “Excuse me???” Sorry, but this reeks of Gary’s misconceptions. How many times have I written…MY job as a researcher is to generate the leads, and YOUR job as a recruiter is to qualify them. Check out the THIRD thing on this list….and it just gets worse and you go down the list! Travel arrangements, referral follow-ups, spousal interface, managing office interruptions and distractions? What is that? Sounds like the equivalent of a hall monitor in elementary school. Read on…

“While a researcher is managing the tasks listed above, the search recruiter is free to do far more of what really produces fees: marketing, recruiting and closing.”

Yes yes, because the recruiter is the only one doing anything that will produce fees – at least that is what a lot of them seem to think! Let’s completely ignore the fact that the researcher, who is apparently busy standing over them and monitoring their distractions, has not contributed to the fee producing process. Read on…

“The role of the researcher may appear to be somewhat administrative in the classic sense. But, I would advise that a fully trained and dedicated researcher must be supported by an office assistant handling word processing, answering a telephone, and other administrative chores.”

Doug mentions later on that part of the researcher’s administrative tasks is ‘handling telephone traffic’. I thought this was the responsibility of their office assistant mentioned above?

“Maintaining currency of the database and hiring managers’ contacts is a recommended procedure for all placement services companies. The time spent chasing lost causes and dead-ends is very costly. Researchers can insure that the candidates we call our[sic] both pre-qualified, currently available and worth our critical time.”

Maintaining currency of the database IS important. I agree with this. However, I think this is a responsibility of all who use the database. If you are a recruiter and you call up a contact whose information is outdated, ask them for their current info and then put it in your database. This is not the sole responsibility of the researcher. Read on…

“The biggest billers will be those who can work the most searches and deliver the goods. Having a fully qualified and effective researcher utilizing an intelligent investment in technology tools has become a non-negotiable reality of the competitive recruiting firm.”

Intelligent investment in technology tools – I like that! A glimmer of hope in the middle of a sea of despair…but then…

“Researchers can be most productive when given the lion’s share of the administrative tasks….thus freeing up invaluable creative time for the recruiter to generate results.”

Crash and burn! Administrative tasks….when are you people going to learn that by having your researcher doing administrative tasks such as invoicing, answering phones, arranging interview travel, and other such things that should be in the description of your office manager or admin assistant, that you are wasting your researcher’s talent. Everyone needs to pitch in and answer the phone if no one is picking it up, but for Heaven’s sake, let your researcher RESEARCH!

Doug also lists out some qualities to look for when seeking a researcher. While his list is okay (at best) I think he should have a chat with Maureen Sharib who offered up to me some excellent ideas of skills to be watchful for when searching for a researcher. Some of the things included on his must-have’s for a good researcher included sense of humor, resiliency, and check references. I guess working with Doug and his ideas of what research is, you’ll need a sense of humor. While these are good characteristics of anyone desiring to be an employee with a company, I think there are more important skills needed for research.

Doug continues on by dividing the “desk” into two categories which he calls “creative” a
nd “administrative”. I think perhaps he means ‘creative’ as ‘Recruiter/Self-Proclaimed God’s Gift to the World’. Here are the divisions in job functions that he lists:

“Creative:

  • Initiating, developing and closing placements
  • Initiating, improving and maintaining hiring managers relationships
  • Managing multiple searches
  • Office and staff development

Administrative:

  • Handling details and tasks
  • Technology tools maintenance
  • Vendor interface
  • Information mining
  • Handling telephone traffic”

All important things to produce the final outcome of a placement. But why isn’t Information mining in the ‘creative’ section? Unless you as a researcher are doing little more than harvesting resumes off of Monster, you’ve had to be pretty darned creative with your method of conducting search. Look at Mike Notaro’s blog and tell me that’s not creative stuff right there.

Doug should have read what he wrote in his own summary of this article – “Researchers can and should become a profit-center in your business” – and gone back and made some adjustments to some of the things he wrote.

What I’m trying to say here is this: please PLEASE do not continue to undervalue your researchers by making them do some of these things! Research is so important for YOU as a recruiter to do your job right. Research is the backbone of any successful recruiting practice, and the most successful ones understand the responsibilities of research and – surprise! – allow their researchers to do just that! Bogging them down with things that can, and should, be done by an administrative assistant, wastes their talent as well as YOUR TIME. Take the time to find out where your researcher’s time is going to be best used, and then put them to work doing those activities.

Doug, if you are reading this, don’t think that I do not respect you or your experience. But I think that there are some things about research that haven’t quite sunk in yet.


The keys to your job search are at JobCentral.

View Comments

Mar 12 2007

Big Dance – Recruiting and Research NCAA Tournament Pool

In honor of my beloved Gators’ top #1 seed in the NCAA DI Men’s Basketball Tournament, I want to have a little fun! So, I’m throwing out a Tournament Bracket Pool for my friends and faithful blog readers. Come one and all and let’s see who (Gators) will win the Big Dance (Florida).

There IS a prize too! I’m not going to spill the beans on the exact details, but just know that it will be a sourcing goodie bag filled with all sorts of good stuff to help you out…… :)

Here’s the info if you’d like to join up:

Go to the Yahoo! Tournament Bracket Groups.
Enter Group ID# 92286
Enter password sourcing07

Choose a name for your bracket and fill in your picks.
I am asking for a $10 buy-in to participate. Please email me for payment info (I will be using PayPal).
(Don’t worry; I’m not keeping this $$, it will be used to purchase the contents of the goodie bag!)
The contents of the goodie bag will be determined by the number of participants! Tell your recruiting and sourcing friends to join in!

Hey you non-United States residents; you can participate too if you want! I’ll share with you my friend Jeff’s secret to picking his winners; he chooses by ‘strength of mascot’. Example: #5 Butler (Bulldogs) vs. #12 Old Dominion (Monarchs [Lions]) – he would pick Old Dominion because a lion would kill a bulldog. His winning streak speaks for itself with this method of selection!

Please get registered and fill out your brackets by Wednesday at 11:59pm in order to participate! This is just for fun but I will look forward to some friendly smack talk. Looking forward to a great Tournament.

View Comments

Mar 09 2007

My Thoughts On Animal's Radio Show on The Influence Of Blogging

…a letter I sent to Animal this morning:

Just wanted to share my thoughts on your show:

Recruiting blogs seem to influence those who bother reading them, which seem to be mostly others who write them. So we seem to feed off each other. A couple of my friends and former colleagues read mine but only because I tooted my own horn and sent them a link to it.

I liked what Steve R. said about putting all your eggs in one basket. Anyone who would solely rely on a blog for getting the word out is going to shoot themselves in the foot, just as if a brick and mortar establishment were only to run ads in the local newspaper or only ran one TV ad.

Dave M. had a lot of good stuff to say and I enjoyed hearing what he talked about. I agree with him that internal censorship will water down the content of anything that might be written on a blog and thus make it a bit vanilla to readers. You can’t be completely honest about anything if you’re worried about getting canned for saying something. He also mentioned spheres of influence and I agree with this as well. Certain groups of people would seem to gravitate toward blogging while others will not. Some people see no use in them but that doesn’t mean they are useless. It would seem to be a matter of perception. You perceive that they do not influence, which I agree with to a certain degree. They don’t influence those who see no use in them.

We have a brand new recruiting franchise owner who is a pretty young guy. He approached me for some ideas on how he could learn more about his industry. I suggested that he start a blog focused on his industry and couple that with some professional networking. I told him to promote his blog within his network and reach out to the players in his industry. I’ve tried to help him with his content and he’s had some great conversations with people in his industry as a result of aggressive networking. He’s even gotten a couple of job orders from these conversations. Do I think this is the norm? Absolutely not. But he’s excited!

I think there’s definitely a future in it. Take ecommerce for example, which I heard mentioned. 15 years ago no one would have given it a second thought as a way to do business. But check this out: Of the top 500 e-tailers in 2006,
142 are owned by store-based retail chains
88 by catalog and direct-marketing firms
45 by consumer branded manufacturers
225 by the so-called pure plays or web-only retailers

Brick and mortar retail companies have obviously discovered the importance of having an online presence to market and influence. I don’t think that other businesses, including recruiting, will be far behind on jumping aboard this bandwagon.

I don’t claim to be an expert on any of this stuff by any stretch of the imagination. I’m simply an interested observer and occasional contributor. I’ve personally gotten a lot out of blogging and the ones that I read. I agree that the majority of recruiters out there don’t read them and don’t see them as a huge influence right now. Someone mentioned that those like Fordyce don’t bother blogging because they are busy making placements. But I definitely think this will grow to be a bigger influence in the future. As a colleague mentioned to me this morning, “…just takes time. Not everyone drove a car, used a phone or had a PC the first 5 years of existence.”

Thanks for letting me share my thoughts!

View Comments

Mar 03 2007

So You Want To Be A……Job Applicant? (part I)

If you’re anything like me, you’re getting real sick of the reality TV shows that keep popping up. From the humble beginnings of Candid Camera (the first real reality TV show dating all the way back to the 1940’s) to the unbelievably ridiculous shows that networks keep pumping out today – shows like Beauty and the Geek, where nerdy guys and luscious gals supposedly “received lessons in confidence, equality, and dignity”, or Survival of the Richest, a show that paired up rich kids with poor kids to “show off the differences between the rich and the poor.”. As a society we gobble this crap up like there was no tomorrow. Why? Are we that bored with our own lives that we have to watch others live theirs in situations that hardly represent true reality in the first place? Yeah I admit, I watch Extreme Makeover – Home Edition; I feel it’s the only reality show out there worth paying attention to because it’s designed to help those in true need. But when NBC starts throwing teens into reality TV with Endurance, you gotta stop and think about this.

Seems like companies have taken this reality TV elimination concept and twisted it to fit into the recruiting process to bring new employees on to their workforce. I caught a glimpse of the Today Show earlier this week and it looked like they were doing a reality-type elimination round for some new interns. So is this the future of recruiting? Here are some examples of companies who are already participating in this new method of finding qualified applicants:

Even staffing companies are getting in on the game! Access Nurses developed a ‘reality TV’ type recruiting process they called 13 Weeks, outlining the lives of traveling nurses. Companies are finding that applicants flock to the idea of participating in a contest to earn the right for employment. So, I ask this question – how far is this new recruiting process going to go?

  • Are we going to have group elimination round interview screenings? Something along the lines of Boiler Room roundtable eliminations?
  • Will applicants have to participate in gameshow-type scenarios to make it to the next round of interviews?
  • Will there be drama and/or will potential employers throw a wrench into the process in order to stir the ‘interview pot’?
  • Will the applicants have to vote each other ‘off the island’ and out of the interview process?

I think the best example of this corporate interviewing contest concept is The Apprentice. Even the ‘losers’ from this show have the potential to go out and get themselves a good job with the exposure they received being on Trump’s program. Perfect example: Amorosa. If you don’t recognize that name you’re in the minority. Most people know who she is now even though The Donald told her “You’re fired!” She’s done talk shows, TV cameos, and red carpet appearances since getting the boot.

As I am writing this article, I am torn on my feelings about this new interviewing concept. Chatting with my friend Jim, I was able to sort some of my confusion out. Some of the pros I came up with are:

  • Holding a contest for potential applicants is a great way for a company to get its name out there, especially a lesser-known company
  • Holding a contest will allow potential candidates to show their applicable skills to potential employers instead of relying solely on what’s on their resume
  • Contests promoted in the public eye will give applicants an opportunity to market themselves to several potential employers all at once
  • This is a potential answer to a question I’ve seen come up a lot lately, revolving around doing away with traditional methods of interviewing
  • This will also create greater interest in the younger generations entering the workforce

Some of the cons I thought about:

  • This might create a lengthier interview process
  • Older generations might be alienated in this attempt to reach a younger crowd
  • Some people may elect to participate just to be part of the contest with no real chance to earn a job (recruiters see this all the time in the burger-flipper who submits his resume for the VP of Sales position)
  • Contests might not work for certain job functions: how do you hold a contest for purchasing? Or for plant management? Seems as though the technical opportunities are the best place to use a recruiting contest

As much as I may not want to admit it, I will conclude that I think using a contest to invite potential job applicants is a pretty cool concept. I think the biggest benefit to this idea is getting your name out there. This holds true for both the contest participant as well as the company putting on the contest. As a participant, you will be judged based on the contest results. As a company, you will narrow your applicant pool to those who are truly interested and/or qualified to participate as well as get your company’s name out there.

I still think reality TV sucks and we are all better off living our own lives rather than watching others live theirs. But the idea of using this concept in recruiting is pretty smart. This is a good alternative to traditional interviewing and a great way to reach younger generations. Contests keep things interesting, and if the prize is a rewarding career, then that’s alright in my book.

Coming next….some ideas on how you can create your own recruiting contest….stay tuned!

View Comments

« Prev - Next »

Search